Pages

Monday, November 23, 2009

A brief understanding of International Public Relations


Before talking about international public relations, the role of “Government” in an international environment should be considered.

It is supposed that, no matter what the political system in a country is, no government could represent its whole country’s will, especially in democratic counties. An open communication environment undoubtedly puts more pressure and challenges on the government when dealing with its internal public opinions, compared to other different political systems. Major public opinion tends to be more powerful in influencing a democratic government’s decision. But in an international environment, as a body which has the authority to make and enforce rules, laws and regulations, government tends to express its opinion in the name of its country. This means, the government is the final one to decide the image of its country on the international stage, and, it is the only authority makes practical influences on the country’s relations with other countries.

Based on the above opinion and the concept of “Public Relations”, in my opinion a country’s international public relations can be understood as “the management of communication to improve or maintain a po
sitive relationship with other counties, with the purpose of gaining more international understanding and support for its opinions and actions.” For the sake of the win-win goal, two-way communication models are always conducted between two counties, and, the government is the main public relations practioner and facilitator that represents its country in international public relations; it designs and complements the public relations campaigns.

International Public Relations should be differentiated from “International Diplomacy” and “Public Diplomacy”. Since Diplomacy refers to the art and practice of conducting negotiations between representatives of gr
oups or states, anything which is labeled with “Diplomacy” should be regarded as a tool to deal with international public relations. International diplomacy is the conduct of international relations through the intercession of professional diplomats with regard to issues of peace-making, trade, war, economics and culture. It focuses on the function of “negotiation” and “Diplomatic visits”. Public Diplomacy which is always closely associated with the United States Information Agency, focuses on the ways in which a country (or multi-lateral organization such as the United Nations) communicates with citizens in other societies. It can be comprehended that Public Diplomacy divides another country’s government and citizens into two publics. Different from other independent publics whose attitude will not influence another one, there is a mutual influential power between the government and citizens in one country. Public Diplomacy tends to take advantage of the favorable public to influence or even force the other one to change the attitude and behaviours. The effects of it are more obvious in democratic countries. However, in international public relations, a country’s government and its citizens should be regarded as a whole, and, the dealing focus should always be put on the government, which represents the whole country’s voice on the world stage.

A good example of a country taking advantage of a “Diplomacy” tool to deal with international public relations is the recent diplomatic visit from the president of the United States, Obama’s, to Asia. On 15th November 2009, in Obama’s first diplomatic visit to China, he successfully conveyed the attitude from the American government on the China-America relationship, climate, and global economy to the Chinese government and Chinese people. If conveying ideas and thoughts was his purpose for this campaign, the diplomatic visit was definitely successful. But how much this diplomatic visit could do for the relationship between China and America in the long term is still unknown and hard to predict. It is true that a slogan of “Yes, we can” helped Mr. Obama win the American’s hearts. His successful campaigns showed the power of his public relations machine. China, as one of the largest nations, is crucial to the United States in its international public relations and vice versa. So, how Mr. Obama and his American government could win the Chinese hearts and minds is the answer which the whole world is eager to know.


As we can see, a campaign in dealing with international public relations is different from one of a company’s; it is more complicated to set an objective and needs a much longer time scale to measure how much it works on changing the publics’ attitude and behaviours
.
Don't miss Obama's fantistic speech in China:


2 comments:

  1. Re hearts and minds - when you get them by their currency reserves their hearts and minds will soon follow! Currently China and the US are locked in mutual economic inter-dependence. The messages coming out of the United States give mixed signals as to whether the relationship will be one of mutual, peaceful co-operation dealing with common problems or whether the traditional power politic relationship between a rising power such as China and an established power such as the US will arise. The Bush administration labelled China a "strategic competitor" without detailing whether the competition was economic, political or military. On the one hand we have the public stance of Obma personally as stated in his speech and then the concerns raised by Hilary Clinton and others about the lack of transparency about the alleged Chinese military build-up particualrly its navy. Again we see the US pursuing a twin-track strategy - or perhaps more fundamentally the US establishment is not sure itself whether the rise of China will be good for the world economy as a whole or whether its main effect will be to replace or diminish US economic and political influence. Most US/Western theoreticians of realpolitik and geo-political strategy tend to assume - using history as an example - that eventually there will be tension between these two countries in the Asia-Pacific region if not globally. however the past is not always a reliable guide to the future and such a mindset of course may become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Re Steve: Actually, we've got the present attitude of America on the relationship with China from Obama's , China was described as "Neither Our Enemy Nor Our Friend"(Please see: http://transpacifica.net/2007/04/27/obama-on-china-neither-our-enemy-nor-our-friend/).Compared to the former "Strategic competitor" in Bush's period, most chinese people prefer the latter one.Maybe we could regard it as a postive attitude change which was made by Obama's PR campaign.

    Although it is still a long way to go to make two counties "closer",at least, from two countries' attitudes, we can see something is changing to positive direction. It is obvious that Chinese government is expecting much from this new "President of America",they believe since Obamam has created a miracle in America's history,why couldn't he and his government create a breakthrough in the relationship with China?Maybe such thinking is too optimistic, and just from chinese side,but after all, as you said, two countries are locked in many globel issues, it is the crucial time for two countries to sit down and have a deeper negotiation.

    Many people,like me, are just curious about what's kind of role will Obama's PR machine play in this relationship show?Let's expect it..

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.